On April 30, 2026, the Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) National Fraud Enforcement Division (“Fraud Division”) announced the formation of the West Coast Health Care Fraud Strike Force, a multi-district enforcement initiative spanning Arizona, Nevada, and the Northern District of California. [1] Announced by Assistant Attorney General Colin McDonald, the new Strike Force signals a significant escalation of federal health care fraud enforcement in the broader West Coast region and warrants close attention from health care providers, technology companies, and other industry participants operating in the area.
Enforcement and Prosecution Policy and Trends, Fraud, Deception and False Claims, Government Contracts
FAR Council Issues Implementation Guidance for Executive Order 14398: New DEI Contract Clause Requirements for Federal Contractors
On April 20, 2026, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory (FAR) Council issued agency implementation guidance for Executive Order (E.O.) 14398, “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors,” which President Trump signed on March 26, 2026. The guidance introduces a new contract clause — FAR 52.222-90 — and establishes tight deadlines for agencies to incorporate the clause into new and existing contracts. Federal contractors, subcontractors, and their compliance teams should take immediate steps to understand the scope of the new requirements and prepare for implementation. Contractors should take note that the implementation of this new clause may be affected by a suit filed in Maryland federal court seeking to block the executive order.
This alert summarizes the key provisions of E.O. 14398, the FAR Council’s implementing guidance, and the practical steps contractors should consider in response.
Enforcement and Prosecution Policy and Trends, Fraud, Deception and False Claims, Government Contracts
GSA AI Procurement Rules Would Introduce New Disclosure and Use-Rights Requirements for Federal Contractors
The General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service has released draft contract terms and conditions related to artificial intelligence (AI)-related procurements through a new proposed GSAR clause 552.239-7001, “Basic Safeguarding of Artificial Intelligence Systems (FEB 2026) (GSAR Deviation), that would impose material new requirements on contractors and service providers supplying artificial intelligence capabilities to the federal government. If adopted, the clause would be inserted into all solicitations and contracts for AI capabilities and would govern data rights, disclosure obligations, security protocols, and performance standards for AI systems used in federal operations. Federal contractors, technology vendors, and their in-house operations and counsel teams should closely review the proposed terms, as they represent one of the most comprehensive efforts to date to regulate the procurement and use of AI systems across the federal enterprise.
Old Wine, New Bottles? FinCEN Proposes to Codify AML/CFT Program Standards for Financial Institutions
On April 7, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) that would formalize and, in certain respects, update the requirements for financial institutions’ anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (“AML/CFT”) programs under the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”). While FinCEN has characterized the proposed rule as the centerpiece of Treasury’s broader effort to modernize the U.S. AML/CFT regulatory and supervisory framework, many of its core elements reflect longstanding statutory requirements and supervisory expectations. The proposed rule fully supersedes a prior proposed rule FinCEN published on July 3, 2024, which the agency is withdrawing. Concurrently, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), and the National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”) (collectively, the “Agencies”) issued their own joint NPRM proposing substantially aligned amendments to their respective AML/CFT program rules for banks they supervise. Public comments are due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
This alert summarizes the key provisions of both proposals, describes the proposed changes to bank supervision and enforcement, and identifies practical implications for financial institutions and compliance professionals. As discussed below, many of the proposed requirements may be familiar to institutions with mature, risk-based AML/CFT programs.
Ninth Circuit Ruling in FCA Case Predicated on 340B Pricing Violations Has Significant Implications for Pharma Manufacturers
On March 17, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a significant opinion in United States ex rel. Adventist Health System of West v. AbbVie Inc., reversing the district court’s dismissal of a qui tam complaint brought under the False Claims Act (FCA) against four major drug manufacturers. The Ninth Circuit held that the FCA provides an independent mechanism for relators to bring claims alleging fraudulent drug pricing in violation of the Public Health Service Act’s Section 340B Program, even though Section 340B does not provide a private right of action.
Read on to learn more about the ruling and its important implications for pharmaceutical manufacturers participating in the Section 340B Program.
SEC Enforcement Speaks in 2026: Enforcement Division Moves “Full Steam Ahead” with Focus on Quality over Quantity, Procedural Fairness, and Targeted Pursuit of Non-Fraud Violations
SEC Acting Enforcement Director Sam Waldon declared recently that his division is moving “full steam ahead” against those who “lie, cheat, and steal” but also is focusing on quality over quantity. He rejected traditional metrics — case counts, penalty totals and aggregate dollar amounts — as effective measures of the SEC’s enforcement program.
At the 2026 SEC Speaks Conference held last month in Washington, D.C., Waldon and senior enforcement leaders emphasized the division’s commitment to transparency and procedural fairness, as embodied by recent revisions to its Enforcement Manual. The more prominent revisions are intended to foster robust two-way engagement with defense counsel during the Wells process and articulate clearer guideposts for the staff’s assessment of public company cooperation under the Seaboard factors and corporate penalties under the Commission’s 2006 Penalty Statement. Waldon also confirmed that the division will continue to bring non-fraud cases in the right circumstances — with a more thoughtful approach. He said his division aims to distinguish between an entity that makes “an honest mistake, recognizes the mistake, fixes the mistake, takes steps to remediate and improves internal controls” and one that “engages in multiple mistakes, doesn’t think it’s a mistake, covers up the mistake, [and] didn’t take steps to remediate.”
Read on to learn more about Waldon’s remarks and what companies should take away from them.
Enforcement and Prosecution Policy and Trends, Fraud, Deception and False Claims, Government Contracts
New Executive Order Targets DEI Practices by Federal Contractors, Imposes Mandatory Contract Clause and FCA Liability
Continuing his Administration’s efforts to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities, President Donald Trump signed an executive order, “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors,” on March 26, 2026 that directs all executive departments and agencies to include a new clause in all federal contracts and subcontracts prohibiting what the order defines as “racially discriminatory DEI activities.” The order represents another escalation of the Administration’s efforts to restrict DEI programs in the federal contracting space — building on Executive Order 14173 and the Department of Justice’s May 2025 Civil Rights Fraud Initiative — and carries substantial enforcement implications, including potential liability under the False Claims Act (FCA).
This alert summarizes the key provisions of the new executive order, analyzes the practical implications for federal contractors and subcontractors, and outlines recommended steps for compliance.
$300 Million Reasons to Talk: FinCEN Proposes a Whistleblower Reward Program for AML and Sanctions Violations
On March 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) submitted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) for publication in the Federal Register that would, for the first time, establish a comprehensive framework for paying monetary awards to individuals who report violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”), U.S. sanctions programs administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), and several other laws critical to safeguarding the financial system and national security. The proposed rule is the culmination of a multi-year legislative effort to create financial incentives and protections comparable to the longstanding whistleblower programs administered by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and other agencies. Although FinCEN has accepted tips since launching a dedicated whistleblower portal in February 2026, the NPRM, if adopted as a final rule, would allow for the payment of substantial monetary awards from a $300 million revolving fund. This alert summarizes the proposal’s key provisions, compares the proposed program to its federal counterparts, and identifies practical implications for financial institutions, compliance professionals, and potential whistleblowers.
White House Releases AI Legislative Recommendations—Congress Has the Blueprint, but Questions Remain
On March 20, 2026, the White House unveiled its National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence, providing a blueprint on legislative recommendations and urging Congress to act. It recommends that Congress create a unified federal standard to reduce the regulatory friction of competing state AI regimes, promote AI innovation and develop an AI-ready workforce, while ensuring the protection of children, consumers and intellectual property rights.
The framework is a serious, if incomplete, attempt to bring coherence to an enforcement landscape that has been improvising. Congress has been handed a blueprint, but whether it is able to enact comprehensive federal legislation is another matter.
Read on to learn more about the framework and how companies using AI should prepare.
New GSA Proposal Could Expose Federally Funded Institutions With Programs Perceived as DEI-Related
The General Services Administration has proposed requiring all federal funding recipients to certify that they do not maintain diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility programs. Recipients also would also need to certify they are not knowingly hiring or recruiting undocumented staff.
The GSA estimates the proposal would impact approximately 222,760 entities — including colleges and universities. If enacted, the certification requirements would expose grant recipients to potential liability under the False Claims Act. The deadline for public comments is March 30, 2026.
Read on to learn more about the GSA proposal and its potential impacts on federally funded institutions.