Subject to Inquiry

Subject to Inquiry

THE LATEST ON GOVERNMENT INQUIRIES AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation Group
Government Contracts

DoW Announces Line-by-Line Review of Certain 8(a) Contracts Amid Government-wide Scrutiny of the 8(a) Program

On January 16, 2026, the Secretary of War Pete Hegseth posted a video on social media announcing that the Department of War will conduct a “line‑by‑line review of every small business, sole source, 8(a) contract that is over $20 million,” focusing on impermissible pass‑throughs to large businesses.  This action by the DoW aligns with broader federal investigations and audits of the 8(a) program.

Continue Reading

Fraud, Deception and False Claims

Creation of DOJ Fraud Division Signals Increased White-Collar Enforcement

On Jan. 8, 2026, the White House announced the establishment of the DOJ’s Division for National Fraud Enforcement. The Trump administration stated that the new division will “combat the rampant and pervasive problem of fraud in the United States” and “enforce the Federal criminal and civil laws against fraud targeting Federal government programs, Federally funded benefits, businesses, nonprofits, and private citizens nationwide.” This announcement expands upon the Trump administration’s efforts to use the False Claims Act in connection with increased enforcement in areas including DEI initiatives, healthcare fraud and cybersecurity issues. While the creation of the new division accompanied no change in law, federally funded entities should be aware that it may signal increased white-collar enforcement mirroring the administration’s policy priorities.

To learn more, see our post at The FCA Insider.

Anti-Money Laundering, Compliance, Enforcement and Prosecution Policy and Trends

FinCEN Announces Data-Driven Operation Targeting Southwest Border MSBs

On December 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced a multifaceted data-driven operation to address potential money laundering, focused on more than 100 U.S. money services businesses (MSBs) operating along the southwest border. MSBs are non-bank financial institutions that provide certain financial services, including money transmission, check cashing, and foreign currency exchange. This operation will focus on MSBs’ potential non-compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and other regulations by examining Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) and Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs), which MSBs and other financial institutions must submit under BSA regulations.  

Because MSBs operating along the southwest border face heightened risk of “cartel-related money laundering,” including the use of proceeds from drug trafficking, human smuggling, and terrorism, this operation is consistent with President Trump’s designation of certain international criminal cartels and organizations as foreign terrorist organizations.

Continue Reading

Anti-Money Laundering

Reducing BSA Compliance Obligations? A Look at the Senate’s STREAMLINE Act

The Senate has introduced the Streamlining Transaction Reporting and Ensuring Anti-Money Laundering Improvements for a New Era Act, or the STREAMLINE Act, an initiative led by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Senator John Kennedy, with support from several Republican co-sponsors.

For the first time in over five decades, the bill would modernize key components of the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”). Some key proposed changes include: (1) increasing the reporting thresholds, (2) instituting periodic inflation adjustments, and (3) requiring Treasury to update and rationalize reporting processes and related form.  Industry groups, including the American Bankers Association and leading credit unions and community banking associations, have expressed support.

This article summarizes the bill’s core provisions that may impact banks, credit unions, money services businesses, and businesses that engage in large cash transactions.

Continue Reading

Anti-Money Laundering, Compliance, Enforcement and Prosecution Policy and Trends

FinCEN Eyes Easing Compliance Burdens on Financial Institutions

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) has recently taken two steps in furtherance of the Trump Administration’s deregulatory agenda.  In late September, FinCEN posted a notice to the Federal Register soliciting comments on a proposed “Survey of the Costs of Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Compliance” to be completed by non-bank financial institutions (“NBFIs”).  On October 9, FinCEN published a series of frequently asked questions (“FAQs”) aimed at clarifying the requirements around filing suspicious activity reports (“SARs”).  Both actions point to an effort to ease compliance costs and align compliance efforts with law enforcement priorities.

Continue Reading

Government Contracts

Department of Defense Issues Final Rule on Cybersecurity Standards for Contractors

After years of waiting, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) posted to the Federal Register for public inspection on September 9, 2025, a final rule implementing the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification 2.0 (CMMC 2.0) standards into the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) (the Final Rule), which was formally published a day later on September 10, 2025. The Final Rule’s requirements will become effective in the DFARS as of November 10, 2025, and pertain to all DoD contractors and subcontractors.  Defense contractors should ensure their compliance with the standards as soon as possible in order to maintain eligibility to compete for DoD contracts and perform DoD subcontracts, as well as to avoid bid protests and/or civil False Claims Act allegations.

Continue Reading

Enforcement and Prosecution Policy and Trends

State AGs Step Up Enforcement: Recent Lessons from Privacy Law Enforcement in Connecticut and Nebraska

As comprehensive state privacy laws continue to take root across the United States, recent enforcement actions by the attorneys general of Connecticut and Nebraska highlight an important shift — ensuring privacy law compliance vis-à-vis comprehensive privacy laws or other means is a top enforcement priority outside of California.

Read on to learn more about state actions in Connecticut and Nebraska and how they highlight how companies that prioritize consumer trust and regulatory compliance stay ahead of the curve.

Fraud, Deception and False Claims

California Defense Contractor and Private Equity Firm Agree to Pay $1.75M to Resolve False Claims Act Liability Relating to Voluntary Self-Disclosure of Cybersecurity Violations

On July 31, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice  (“DOJ”) announced a $1.75 million False Claims Act (“FCA”) settlement with Aero Turbine Inc. (“Aero Turbine”), a California-based defense contractor, and private equity firm Gallant Capital Partners LLC (“Gallant Capital”).  The settlement arises out of allegations that Aero Turbine failed to comply with certain cybersecurity requirements under an Air Force contract and provided impermissible foreign third party access to sensitive defense information.  This settlement highlights yet another example of the DOJ’s increased scrutiny of cybersecurity requirements (under the Cyber Fraud Task Force), specifically including the protection of Controlled Defense Information (“CDI”), under the FCA.  The settlement is also an example of DOJ’s focus on (1) pursuing private equity investors and (2) rewarding entities that self-disclose and remediate wrongdoing.   

Continue Reading

Anti-Money Laundering

FinCEN Hits Pause: AML Rule for Investment Advisers Delayed

In a move to balance regulatory efficiency and cost, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) officially announced on July 21, 2025, that it will postpone the effective date, from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2028, of the Investment Adviser Anti-Money Laundering Rule (“IA AML Rule”), see Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism Program and Suspicious Activity Report Filing Requirements for Registered Investment Advisers and Exempt Reporting Advisers.

Continue Reading

Enforcement and Prosecution Policy and Trends

DOJ’s Antitrust Division Announces New Whistleblower Rewards Program

Earlier this week, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division announced that, for the first time ever, it will offer rewards to individuals who report antitrust crimes and related offenses.

Partnering with the United States Postal Service, the Antitrust Division now invites individuals with original and specific information about antitrust crimes to voluntarily report that information and, in appropriate cases, earn substantial monetary rewards of up to 30% of any criminal fines recovered. While alleged violations must be nominally related to “the Postal Service, its revenues, or property,” whistleblowers need not articulate a material or significant harm to the USPS to be eligible for the program.

Continue Reading

We use cookies to enhance your experience of our website. By continuing to use this website, you agree to the use of these cookies. For more information and to learn how you can change your cookie settings, please see our policy.

Agree